Research Keyword: specificity

Closing the diagnostic gap in medical mycology: The LODDY Test for identification of Lodderomyces elongisporus

mycolabadmin

Researchers developed a simple and affordable test called the LODDY Test to identify a dangerous yeast called Lodderomyces elongisporus that is often mistaken for a similar but less dangerous yeast. This test uses color changes on a special culture medium to distinguish between different yeast species in just 48 hours without expensive equipment. The test works perfectly in laboratories worldwide and could help doctors in developing countries diagnose and treat serious fungal infections more quickly and accurately.

Read More »

PCR enables rapid detection of dermatophytes in practice

mycolabadmin

This study shows that a new rapid DNA-based test (PCR) is much faster and more effective than traditional methods for diagnosing fungal skin, hair, and nail infections. While traditional culture methods took about 19 days to get results, the new PCR test gives results in just 16 hours. The PCR test detected more infections and is now the preferred diagnostic method in Northern Finland, helping doctors treat patients more quickly and avoid unnecessary antifungal medications.

Read More »

The diagnosis of mucormycosis by PCR in patients at risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

mycolabadmin

This study evaluated how well PCR blood tests and tissue samples can diagnose a serious fungal infection called mucormycosis. Researchers analyzed 30 previous studies and found that PCR testing works very well, especially on respiratory fluid samples. Blood tests showed good accuracy too and could be useful for screening high-risk patients without requiring invasive procedures. The findings suggest PCR should become a standard diagnostic method for this difficult-to-diagnose infection.

Read More »

Performance Evaluation of Five Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Candida auris DNA

mycolabadmin

Candida auris is a dangerous fungal infection that spreads in hospitals and resists common antifungal medications. Researchers compared five different rapid tests (PCR assays) to see which ones best detect this pathogen. The study found that different tests vary widely in their ability to detect the fungus, with some being much more sensitive than others. The findings highlight the need for standardized testing methods worldwide to ensure hospitals can reliably identify and control C. auris infections.

Read More »

Multicenter performance evaluation of the “quanty TOXO (RH region)” kit (Clonit) for molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis

mycolabadmin

Researchers from seven French hospitals tested a commercial DNA test kit called “quanty TOXO” that detects Toxoplasma gondii, a parasite causing serious infections in pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems. The kit performed well overall, correctly identifying infection in nearly 95% of positive cases and showing no false positives. However, the test sometimes missed infections when parasite levels were very low, suggesting doctors should run tests twice to increase detection chances.

Read More »

Etiological Agents and Predisposing Factors of Superficial Fungal Infections in Northeastern Argentina

mycolabadmin

Researchers studied fungal skin infections in a community in northeastern Argentina, finding that 37% of patients had these infections. The most common cause was a fungus called Trichophyton tonsurans. Poor living conditions like overcrowding and lack of clean water increased infection risk. The study shows that fungal skin infections are a significant health problem in areas with limited access to basic sanitation and water services.

Read More »

Keep the Hospital Clean: Diagnostic Performance of Ten Different Molecular and Culture-Based Methods to Detect Candidozyma (Candida) auris

mycolabadmin

This study tested different methods to detect a dangerous hospital fungus called Candida auris. Researchers compared growing the fungus on special plates and using molecular tests on patient samples. They found that molecular tests (qPCR) were most sensitive for detecting low levels of the fungus, while growing it on special plates worked well for higher levels. The best approach depends on whether a hospital is dealing with an outbreak or routine screening.

Read More »
Scroll to Top